-edible zone-

 

 An early model SP10 mkII fitted to a custom plinth called "The Mule". One of the plinth's design goals was to minimize the footprint area of the deck. Another goal was to obfuscate the visual mismatch between the rather large aluminum chassis, with oversized platter, when fitted with a 9inch tonearm such as the Graham 2.2. It should be noted that Technics designed their deck to be used with their own 10 inch tonearms.

* (click thumbnail for full size image)

Above: mule concept

    I have the SP10 mkII standing over a Minus-K isolation platform. It is a rather massive pile-up. And it is massive looking. However the arrangement does in fact improve the audible performance of this player while in my listening room.

 The 18 x 18 x 3 inch granite machinists' plate is there to add balast over the Minus-K. 100 lbs just for the plate! For this deck a smaller Minus-K might have been chosen, but..... I also have a massive slate plinth for use with a TD124 that also can be used over this Minus-K. With the larger capacity unit, I can accommodate the needs of any lighter turntable simply by including the right amount of balast in the stack-up.

Also within the stack is a Neuance platform from Ken Lyon's Greater Ranges. This shelf interacts with the 'original stillpoint footers' of the Mule Plinth.

(or so I imagined that it should ;^] )

 

  Yes, it does not touch.

    from the listening spot

Later, I tried another platter mat, the Boston Audio Mat 2.

  I wrote a review of the Mat 2 while in this SP10 mkII.  Hopefull this review will be of some use to others considering another mat for their SP10 mkII. link here

  09/12/2014  Parked on the component rack over a Neuance shelf.  Works fine here too.  This SP10 mkII has been a long term project for me.

  06/10/2015 still playin'

   Link to SP10mkII - The Mule -  project page